Search for: "Doe v. Doe et al" Results 61 - 80 of 8,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 12:56 pm by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Amended motion for summary judgment — Need for hearing Polly Traynham, appellant, appeals from the denial of her amended motion for summary judgment, by the Circuit Court for St. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 6:43 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0618, 2016 MT 184, PETER ARNONE, DAVE BALDWIN, ROSS HARTMAN, DAWNETTE OSEN, and SHARON SWANSON, Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:18 am by Docket Navigator
Zurn Industries, Inc., et al, 1-10-cv-00204 (ILND November 20, 2013, Order) (St. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 5:46 am by Daily Record Staff
The Appellants have a ten-plus-year history of litigation that grew out of a series of financial transactions going back close to twenty years (or perhaps more, although that does not matter for our purposes). [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:21 pm by MEL
Swegon North America Inc.: Ontario Court of Appeal deals blow to termination provisions in employment agreements       The post Katz et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:30 am
On Friday, the United States Solicitor General urged the court to refuse to hear Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]