Search for: "Doe v. Harder"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2023, 5:51 am
What the court does with that request will of course be very closely watched. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
Ill.) in Robe Probe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:17 pm
Opus One d/b/a Contest Factory v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Because the court’s ruling in that case, Fischer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am
With respect to the editorial discretion arguments, the Fifth Circuit found first that editorial discretion likely does not exist as an independent category under the First Amendment, but second that even if it does, then content moderation is not an example of it. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am
“An exercise of reasonable medical judgment does not mean that every doctor would reach the same conclusion. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:51 pm
”November 29, 2023 at 06:23 PMBy Aleeza FurmanLitigation ReporterPennsylvania Law WeeklyWhat You Need to KnowThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held that business that only derives a small portion of its revenue from a particular county may still be sued there.The ruling makes it harder for defendants to challenge plaintiffs' choice of venue.Defendants must now look to other factors in addition to percentage of revenue to support their challenges.Corporate defendants have… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:02 am
According to Valencia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Intel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
Of the post-coup elections held in Sub-Saharan Africa since 1991, 44 percent could be reasonably interpreted as credible or mostly credible (having a score of .3 or greater on the 0-1 Electoral Fairness scale from the V-DEM dataset). [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
” Shoff v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
Bottom line: the plaintiff loses her discrimination case under Rule 12, but her retaliation case -- which is not bound by the deliberate indifferent test -- will proceed to discovery.The case is Doe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Even the more modest conclusion, that regulatory permission to deviate from the norm leads to bad outcomes, does not necessarily apply generally. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
”[10] In the case of the allegations by Viktor, the defendants would have had a harder time disproving their copying given that they were clearly aware of the existence of her work and had even expressed a desire for its use in the video. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am
In the first case, Power Integrations v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
It is in this context that the SRB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
Under recent Boards of Appeal EPO case law, the technical effect does not always even have to be mentioned in the application as filed in order to be relied on for inventive step (IPKat). [read post]
