Search for: "Doe v. Medical Center of Louisiana" Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
In a memorandum explaining the company’s position, UnitedHealthcare stated that “[w]hile coupons may appear to be beneficial to members, they ultimately add costs back into the healthcare system by circumventing tiered PDLs that encourage use of lower cost medications. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Information available at this time does not indicate an ongoing risk of hepatitis A virus infection at Tropical Smoothie Cafes. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Children's National Medical Center, 121 A.3d 59, 66 (D.C. 2015) (adopting Restatement §500 “high degree of risk of harm” standard).Florida:  Dyals v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
Since 2006-2008, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) has detected a 52-percent increase in Vibrio infections, including V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus and V. vulnificus. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
  One of the defendants was Caremark, the company that employed a treating nurse at the medical center where the plaintiff was administered the medicine. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Court Finds Rule for Arranging and Labeling Documents Does Not Apply to ESI: In Anderson Living Trust v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  An FDA warning letter does not create a false claim under that (or, we’d like to think any) state’s statute. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
City of New York, 13-1462, and Pregnancy Care Center of New York v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  To be recoverable, a medical expense must be both incurred and reasonable.Howell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]