Search for: "Doe v. Preferred Care Inc. et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
Interclick, Inc., et al., 10-cv-09183-DAB (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
Quest Diagnostics Inc., et al., Civil File No. 05 Civ. 5393 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Shopzilla, Inc., et. al. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
Newmark, et al., C.A. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
John Boyle, et al., 100 Cal. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
John Boyle, et al., 100 Cal. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
SOMA ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
Building Materials Corp. of America et al 2008, WL 5082993 (E.D. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
For example, in 2009, Pfizer Inc. reached a settlement with the federal government and states over allegations of health care fraud contained in nine qui tam cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
Stryker Corp., et al., 2010 WL 743834 (M.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
Chancellor Chandler made it quite clear that Delaware law simply does not support this distinction. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
If the agency’s action is ministerial, CEQA does not apply. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
Ultimax Cement et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch) US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not to compete: Comedy Club… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
Swisa et al. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Mitchell, Brewer, et al v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
