Search for: "Doe v. Shapiro" Results 61 - 80 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2006, 12:26 pm
If this tactic does not deny equal protection as discussed in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the Supreme Court may validate it. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:34 pm
And as a sometimes bankruptcy lawyer, I have to accept the fact that it is not a black mark if you can't immediately conjure up the holding in Shapiro v Wilgus or Case v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Ilya Shapiro
As a Georgetown Law alum wrote, "It was an unholy trilogy that attacked Shapiro. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  Does that also mean the government can require all citizens to buy a General Motors car because we bailed out GM? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The "harassment" policy does ban public expression by professors. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:08 pm by By Adam Wahlberg
Joan Hennessy writes about cover subject Paul Mark Sandler of Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler, a top 10 lawyer who has tried many high-profile cases (including USA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:16 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The difference is that my response does not undermine my policy commitments or give ammunition to the other side. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 2:57 am by Walter Olson
Tam, feds drop effort to void trademark of Washington Redskins [Ilya Shapiro, Eugene Volokh, earlier] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, double jeopardy, football, rule of law Constitutional law roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Second, plaintiffs’ allegations of legal malpractice consist solely of claimed violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which do not alone support a malpractice claim (Shapiro v McNeill, 92 NY2d 91, 97 [1998]). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
  In an op-ed for The Washington Examiner, Gary Shapiro argues that the Court “should weigh in, and rule in favor of Limelight and innovation,” in the patent case Limelight Networks v. [read post]