Search for: "Doe v. Whelan" Results 61 - 80 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Justice Whelan held that imputation 1 was true, but that imputation 2 was defamatory and not true. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am by Andrew Hamm
For National Review’s Bench Memos, Ed Whelan reports that the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty – through an amicus brief filed in Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
”  Yet as Ed Whelan notes, the order neither offers a conclusion on the legality of the accommodation nor does it rest on constitutional grounds. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
  That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am by Amy Howe
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
Apparent findings to the opposite in Basildon v Whelan and in Kensington & Chelsea RLBC v Hislop [2004] HLR 434 were not part of the ratio of the decisions in those cases. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  Ed Whelan has further thoughts here. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:34 pm by Richard Painter
  The same tag team of bloggers has attacked the lawyer in the same case, famed GOP litigator Ted Olson who argued and won Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am by Amanda Rice
In a series of posts for NRO’s Bench Memos, Ed Whelan and Gary Marx suggest that O’Connor’s involvement in the initiative raises significant ethical questions. [read post]