Search for: "Does 1 - 155" Results 61 - 80 of 805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
  The debate over a possible SST designation in the United States, where it does have legal significance, is, at this point, fairly well understood. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
(D.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, at p. 758. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm by Jon Bowers
You have pay the fees for the legal paperwork($155). [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:08 pm by Nicki Milionis
  Section 155 WHS Act: While currently a regulator may serve a written notice under section 155, the proposed amendments will allow for issuing or giving a notice including by personal delivery or by post, facsimile or electronic transmission to the last known place of business. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
The category does not include folding knives ("pocket knives"). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nyazee, Foundations of Article 62(1)(f) in Islamic Law (Being Sadiq and Ameen), (October 6, 2022).Lucas Lixinski, Religious Heritage in International Law: Nationalism, Culture, and Rights,  (64(1) Pravovedenie 138-155 (2020)). [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
But California is one of numerous states whose judiciaries’ subject matter jurisdiction does not depend on standing. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am by Nathan Meyer
In negligence cases, outrageous conduct is often the only way to establish an “evil mind” because: by definition, a negligent defendant does not act with intent; and spite usually does not motivate a negligent defendant. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 8:42 am by Nathan Meyer
In negligence cases, outrageous conduct is often the only way to establish an “evil mind” because: by definition, a negligent defendant does not act with intent; and spite usually does not motivate a negligent defendant. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am by Jeff Welty
Erwin, 155 F.3d 818 (6th Cir. 1998) (“A law enforcement officer does not violate the Fourth Amendment merely by approaching an individual, even when there is no reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, and asking him whether he is willing to answer some questions. . . . [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:27 pm by Calin Yablonski
However, as the case of R v Morrison, 2019 SCC 15 discussed this does not relieve the Crown of its ultimate burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused believed that the complainant was underage. [read post]