Search for: "Does 1-194"
Results 61 - 80
of 675
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 pm
A few years later, Son deeded his 1/2 share in the townhouse to Dad and Dad's now ex-wife, resulting in Dad and ex-wife each owning a 1/2 interest in the whole property as tenants in common. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
In addition, like the AG had done in his Opinion in Constantin Film [here and here], the Opinion expressly rejects what it calls a ‘dynamic’ interpretation of the law (in respect of intermediaries’ stay down obligations: see [194]).Let’s now move on to the core of the AG’s construction of liability under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:40 am
All the measures referred to in this paragraph shall be in accordance with the general principles of Community law…".As to the requirements flowing from Article 15(1) and the Charter read in the light of DRI:- The requirements of PECR Article 15(1) and the Charter are cumulative: "Compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 does not in itself mean that the requirements laid down in Article… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:40 am
All the measures referred to in this paragraph shall be in accordance with the general principles of Community law…".As to the requirements flowing from Article 15(1) and the Charter read in the light of DRI:- The requirements of PECR Article 15(1) and the Charter are cumulative: "Compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 does not in itself mean that the requirements laid down in Article… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:40 am
All the measures referred to in this paragraph shall be in accordance with the general principles of Community law…".As to the requirements flowing from Article 15(1) and the Charter read in the light of DRI:- The requirements of PECR Article 15(1) and the Charter are cumulative: "Compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 does not in itself mean that the requirements laid down in Article… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 19 (1976). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:15 am
194(4) does not operate for or against the plaintiff in this case… [162] I am satisfied that the plaintiff failed to take reasonable care for her own safety, in several respects. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007). [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:19 am
Maryland (H.B. 208 and S.B. 194) Massachusetts (Massachusetts General Laws Ann. 93H §§ 1 et seq.) [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
Patterson, 194 N.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It would seem that other shades of red can still infringe having regard, for instance, to the wording of section 34(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993, which refers to ‘…an identical mark or…a mark so nearly resembling it as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion…’. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
App. 194, 198 (1985). [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
" Thus the issue before the Board involved two questions: (1) Is the Prince of Wales' emblem an insignia of a foreign nation; and (2) if so, does the applied-for mark consist of or comprise that insignia, or a simulation thereof? [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 108 S.Ct. 978, 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988). [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm
LP, 194 Cal. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Held: 1. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
., 2021 WL 3371938, No. 1:00-1898, MDL 1358, No. 14 Civ. 6228 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:18 pm
Under Const 1963, art 6, § 1, it has an obligation to exercise the judicial power to decide the dispute before it. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:17 pm
The Consent Order does not include any fine or penalty to be paid by UEBF, and the agreement states that it is not binding on any other agency, including the IRS. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 pm
From the last sentence of para. 194 of the claimants' memorial: Canada breached [the NAFTA Article 1105(1) guarantee of fair and equitable treatment] by failing to provide a stable regulatory framework for the conduct of petroleum development projects in the Newfoundland offshore area and by frustrating Claimants' legitimate expectations with regard to that regulatory framework. [read post]
