Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
United States, No. 21-1279, 2022 WL 1231428 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
4. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
The Oaths Act, ch. 1, 1 Stat. 23, § 1 states: That the oath or affirmation required by the sixt [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
I hope you can join us for the webinar. 1. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
Question #1 – Does OPM maintain its own public registry of individuals and entities who have been debarred or suspended from the FEHBP program? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
CPLR § 2106 was adopted to provide alternatives to affidavits requiring notarization in two instances, the first being for attorneys and health care practitioners licensed to practice within New York State who are not parties to an action and for those who are physically located outside the United States of America noting: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
” 4. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
" … {The dissent states that the supreme court in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
In this review, we use several sources for the cohort: (1) the civil business-fraud case brought against Trump, his family members, and his businesses by the New York Attorney General; (2) the 2020 “Kraken” King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Plan for growth: We have started a multi-channel marketing effort to reach our target audience and expect growth to compound when attorneys begin to use the platform because it simply does not make sense for attorneys to spend hours drafting when AI can do the same thing in about two minutes. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021),… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
States can’t protect children by overly burdening adult speech, which is what a categorical ban does. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), as: a misappropriation of funds that enriches a person of power or influence who uses the power or influence to make a different individual, organization, or company richer. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Check carefully that both the FDA and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) receive the same information. [read post]
