Search for: "Does 1-61" Results 61 - 80 of 2,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
A Canadian Trust does not work as I am not a full time resident of Canada. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 10:55 am by John Johnson
The most likely targets include districts 61 (SW Milwaukee suburbs), 88 and 89 (both in the Green Bay area), and either 85 (Wausau) or 30 (Hudson). [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
As of February 2, 2023, there have been a total of 44,779 cases with a 61% hospitalization rate (approximately 27,342 hospitalizations). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:10 am by Jenny von Podewils, Leapsome
Managers play a crucial role in this equation, empowering, guiding, and evaluating employees through regular 1:1 meetings. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Does conduct of a particular description, in a specific set of circumstances, on its own unique facts, constitutes having "engaged in" "insurrection or rebellion" within the meaning of the Constitution? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321 (2022) (posted 2/1/22). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
The Constitution's text does not commit Section Three issues to the political judgment and discretion of the political branches of the national government. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Stephanie Rossello
For the purpose of this blogpost, the following question is relevant: “Does article 61(1) of Regulation [2018/858] constitute, for vehicle manufacturers, a legal obligation within the meaning of article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR which justifies the disclosure of VINs or information linked to VINs to independent operators as other controllers within the meaning of point 7 of Article 4 of the GDPR? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, they acknowledged that the President obviously does not appoint himself, but countered that the Appointments Clause does not define who are the "Officers of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
Consequently, the inconsistency one might find to exist between the reasoning of the decision (in paras. 61 and 66, summarised in the list numbered (1) to (4) above) and the official answer (in para. 67, summarised in the list numbered (a) to (d) above), namely that the CJEU mentioned Sentic’s vendors’ assurances as a relevant factor only in the official answer but not in the reasoning, seems irrelevant. 4. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:53 am by John Holtz
Just because information is unclassified, that does not mean it is meant to be disseminated to the public. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am by Anna Maria Stein
The GC replied that “The disclosure of an earlier design within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not, as such, constitute a fact within the meaning of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, but the ‘result of a factual assessment’, EUIPO being required to examine all evidence submitted in order to establish whether it actually proves disclosure of the earlier design” (para 87) and that “the disclosure of an earlier… [read post]