Search for: "Dollar v. Reed"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 9:26 am
In 1975, the United States Supreme Court held in Weinberger v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:53 am
Dinkins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 5:52 am
TEC Olmos, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:33 am
Reed v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
. millions of dollars to test [plaintiffs’] theory that predictive coding would produce a significantly greater number of relevant documents. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 8:33 am
In this guest post, she shares her thoughts and updates us on the related developments.Pemetrexed pops up in MilanGuest Kat Eibhlin gives takes us through the recent decision handed down by the Court of Milan which forms part of the long running multi-jurisdictional battle concerning Eli Lilly's patent protecting its pemetrexed (Alimta) product.Medical data in a twist - Technomed v BluecrestGuest Kat Rosie demystifies database rights with the recent decision of Technomed v… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
And yet this week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Baze v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The case is Tavilla v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:34 am
There is also a run down of ongoing legal action, such as the pending decision in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:17 am
You can access a full copy of Reed v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:25 am
" We await the outcome with interest.Meanwhile, Lucy Reed over at Pink Tape has had another go at Telegraph journalist Christopher Booker. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
Generally, pain and suffering awards in brain damage cases that are sustained in excess of $1,000,000 involve much longer periods of time, such as: Reed v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
The case is Villanueva v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:51 am
Marchese v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The drug brought in more than a billion dollars a year to its patentee- BMS . [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:06 am
Reed Smith has closely tracked this Initiative. [read post]
