Search for: "Doma"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Obama Administration declined to defend Section 3 of DOMA in Windsor. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
Last month, the House Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved a bill to allow same-sex couples who married before the overturn of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) to amend their filing status and claim their tax refunds as jointly-filed spouses. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:15 am
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:34 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
There, the Supreme Court relied upon the House of Representative's efforts to defend on appeal the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) after the Obama administration had conceded the statute's unconstitutionality. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:49 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Federal law was declaring that the definition of marriage requires two people of the opposite sex.It is telling that DOMA’s proponents named the law the “Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:19 am
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:39 am
The attack on DOMA was not his only major case over his 41 year career beginning with his appointment by President Richard Nixon. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:02 pm
How DOMA Reversal Changed Estate Planning Continue reading The post appeared first on New York Estate Planning Lawyer Blog. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 7:26 am
The Defense of Marriage Act provides, in part, that “marriage” is a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:28 pm
Doma Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
These insights proved correct, as the court in Windsor invalidated the relevant provision of the DOMA. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
” By contrast, he observed, “DOMA’s principal effect is to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
“DOMA’s principal effect is to identify and make unequal a subset of state-sanctioned marriages. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 6:40 pm
Section 3 of DOMA was ultimately struck down by a narrow 5-4 majority in the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
In 2011, however, the Obama Administration had already instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), leading to the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
In 2011, however, the Obama Administration had already instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), leading to the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:00 pm
The IRS denied the deduction based on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, even those recognized by a state. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
