Search for: "Don T Hart"
Results 61 - 80
of 868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
I don't think this is consistent with how libel law sees things, and I want to explain why. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:27 am
To begin with, it respects the traditions of legal drafting, providing comfort to adopters and regulatory or judicial reviewers who don’t want to be challenged. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:16 am
You don’t see headlines saying, you know, ‘Take up arms against x group’. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I don’t mean to suggest that that set of questions is any less important now than it has been in the past. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
We have one, you don’t, so we win. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 8:14 am
However, I don’t think any of the Twitter Files items help Huber, at least not yet. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
I don't know. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 am
Hart would later describe as an external perspective. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:03 am
While I hope we are collectively moving beyond the “butts in seats” method of evaluating employee engagement and participation, what we have found is that managers don’t yet have all of the tools to ensure that remote or hybrid workers are treated equitably. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:03 am
While I hope we are collectively moving beyond the “butts in seats” method of evaluating employee engagement and participation, what we have found is that managers don’t yet have all of the tools to ensure that remote or hybrid workers are treated equitably. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:12 am
[Editor’s Note: For a deeper dive into Rangappa’s thoughts on the FBI’s reaction to January 6th and the culture inside the Bureau, listen to her in conversation with former FBI Acting Director Andrew McCabe on the Just Security Podcast] Much attention has been paid to the troubling institutional culture among agents at the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Two decades later, Ely explained, “I don’t think a principled opinion along these lines could have been written at the time” Roe was decided. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:22 pm
Harting didn't take that into consideration at all. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:38 pm
Harting) that preliminary injunctions are meant to be available wherever permanent injunctions would be. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 1:01 pm
But I don't see any evidence of that here. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 2:06 am
Tip 1: Expect the outcome you want, not what you don’t want. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:56 am
Don’t ask me how I came to this information. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Such an argument, made by Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg, didn't carry the day as to public official libel lawsuits in New York Times v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm
I don't know whether Apple actually could replace some chipset within a few months, but again, let's just assume the judge got that part right. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
But then we get the oddity that in principle a very weak precedent can be strengthened by repeated reconsideration and reaffirmation.I don't have a good theoretical solution to what strikes me as a genuine puzzle. [read post]
