Search for: "Don v Singer" Results 61 - 80 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
Not that I don’t think Costco should be punished (although that is what both treble damages and punitive damages are for, no?). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 pm by Gideon
The only incentive – financial loss – was vilely struck down by SCOTUS in a decision (Harry “I’m the singer’s father” Connick v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
-- Could the Religious-Liberty Principle that Catholics Established in Perez v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:15 pm
-based AM and FM radio broadcasters should pay royalties to singers, musicians and their labels. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:16 am by Stephen Honig
” The facts of McKenna v Singer (decided July 31, 2017) are too dense for meaningful summary and if you want a deep dive then read the forty page Court recitation, but the bottom line was that one of the former pair of entrepreneurs was allowed to take the deal for himself. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
In Home, singer Daughtry cautions us "be careful what you wish for, you just might get it all, and then some you don't want. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am by VMaryAbraham
v=6WhWDCw3Mng [Photo Credit: Suzie Katz] [read post]