Search for: "Downing v. Hardy" Results 61 - 80 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Judalong was only the second full decision issued this year, but the Court’s also meted out four summary reversals, all on habeas corpus cases, the latest being Hardy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm by Eric Goldman
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Eady J and Moses LJ handed down a judgment on 17 May 2012 in a Judicial Review brought to challenge orders made to produce footage of the evictions at the Dale Farm (R (on the application of BSkyB v Chelmsford Crown Court [2012] EWHC 1295 (Admin)). [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Eric Goldman
July 29, 2016) Related Posts on Keyword Advertising * Texas Ethics Opinion Approves Competitive Keyword Ads By Lawyers * Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuit–Beast Sports v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
Hardy; several districts have ruled to the contrary… Big one on HB 86 from the 5th District:  in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
Watching one of those come through the station without slowing down had even the most travel-hardy delegate glassy-eyed. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Shook Hardy & Bacon Blog-Tolerant I had to search and then read through Kevin Underhill's bio to find this blog mentioned. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The cases I will be reviewing have been selected because they reiterate the prevailing law, or because they demonstrate the increasing pro-arbitration judicial attitude, or because they raise interesting questions to be examined in the months to come.Seat (or place) versus venue – SC refers issue to larger benchUnion of India v Hardy Exploration and Production (India) Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:06 pm by David Oliver
Consider this story food for thought; and start your munching with Hardy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
” And a 2009 email between 1-800 Contacts marketing employees explains that the purpose of the trademark enforcement policy was to “remove competitors[,] which in turn drives down how much we pay per click. [read post]