Search for: "Duke v. Duke"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
The first, Lambert Simnel, a commoner who was crowned by Yorkist supporters as the supposed “King Edward VI,” and Perkin Warbeck, who pretended to the First Duke of York and the younger son of Edward IV. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On Wednesday 1 November 2023 there will be a CMC in the case of Daedone -v- BBC. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same days, there was a hearing in the case of Hemming v Poulton. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 2:00 am
Zelenak (Duke; Google Scholar), Reading the Taxpayers’ Brief in Moore, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 101 (Oct. 2, 2023): In this article, Zelenak explains that the strategy of the taxpayers’ brief in Moore is to distinguish the mandatory repatriation tax from other provisions that arguably violate Eisner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On 16 and 17 October 2023, Steyn J will hear applications in the case of Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
IPSO 18055-23 Rizwan v essexlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 18056-23 Rizwan v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), No breach – after investigation 18057-23 Rizwan v getreading.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 14277-23 Booley v birminghammail.co.uk (Birmingham… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Court recently confirmed plans to continue live-streaming oral arguments on its website; the first case of the new Term, Pulsifer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 351 (2011), to address the effectiveness of the waiver at the certification stage. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 pm
" Sponsored by the Duke Law School Federalist Society. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Evidence from a Natural Experiment Posted by Hwanki Brian Kim (Baylor University), Woojin Kim (Seoul National University), and Mathias Kronlund (Tulane University), on Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Tags: Corporate cash, investments, natural experiment, payout policy, tax, tax reform, wages Dealing with Activist Hedge Funds and Other Activist Investors Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Tags: activist investors, Asset Managers, Mergers &… [read post]
