Search for: "E. B. Brown"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:43 am
Mary B. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
In City of Toronto, the Chief Justice and Brown J., for the majority, stated that section 2(b) does not import the concept of “effective representation” from section 3: “Simply put, ss. 2(b) and 3 record distinct rights which must be given independent meaning … Effective representation is not a principle of s. 2(b), nor can the concept be imported wholesale from a different Charter right. [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm
§ 1391(e)(1)(B) because the United States, one or more of its agencies, and one or more of its officers in his or her official capacity are Defendants; and a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs' claims occurred in this District. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Brown wrote an e-mail to Mr. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Brown wrote an e-mail to Mr. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:01 am
The Nature and Extent of the Problem E. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Aside from its being a petitio principia, we could probably add that the reaction is emotive, uninformed, and uninformative, and that it fails to support the author’s suggestion that “Daubert has it all wrong,” and that “[w]e need a different approach. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
He argues that when a whistleblower invokes the act and claims he was fired because of his report, Section 1514A(b)(2)(C) of the act provides the claim is “governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
” A page and a half of the report are blacked out, with the names Official A, Official B, Official C, Official D, and Official E added to replace the real names. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Dustin B. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Jill E. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Jill E. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
In construing that language to require a nationwide injunction against enforcement of 36 C.F.R. 215.4(a) and 215.12(f), the court of appeals implicitly assumed that the relevant "agency action[s]" to be "h[e]ld unlawful" and "set aside" were the regulations themselves. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Group Seeks Disbarment of a Trump-Aligned Lawyer for a Key Jan. 6 Witness DNyuz – Charlie Savage (New York Times) | Published: 3/6/2023 In appearing before the January 6 committee last year, Cassidy Hutchinson, the former White House aide who recounted Donald Trump’s conduct in the lead-up to the attacks on the Capitol, shared how her original lawyer had tried to influence her testimony. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm
Brown, 129 N.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
(E) Closing Thoughts Many are disappointed that SCOTUS failed to provide clarity on this important issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:32 pm
AI Generated Librarian as a machine editing a podcast.This is going to be something that all of you will find “interesting,” but maybe not something that you will like. [read post]
