Search for: "E.G. v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION" Results 61 - 80 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
" In 1988, 2004, 2016, and 2020, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice agreed, stating "CON programs are not successful in containing health care costs, and that they pose serious anticompetitive risks that usually outweigh their purported economic benefits. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am by Kurt R. Karst
EKRA is also broadly written because it applies to all “health care benefit” programs. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:02 am by assoulineberlowe
” Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance states that employers should accept an employee’s claim of a sincerely held religious belief unless the employer has an objective basis to deny the exemption. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:59 am by Howard Wasserman
We begin with the state-action argument that has been bandied but that does not work—Shelley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Today, such laws might end up predominantly benefiting conservative speakers; but even today, they may also benefit Socialist or other left-radical speakers—and in the future, they may benefit other speakers who may run afoul of whatever restrictions social media corporations may impose in the future. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
 S.1260 – The United States Innovation and Competition Act share tweet email print NOTEWORTHYBackground: The United States Innovation and Competition Act is comprised of bills reported out of the committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Foreign Relations; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; and the … [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Nathan A. Schacht and Jacob A. Bruner
Given the scope of the Act, employers should also consider developing gender-transition resources for employees to ensure that health care benefits are relevant and applicable to LGBTQ+ employees, including by reviewing health care coverage, leaves of absence, disability-related benefits, and domestic partner and same-sex spousal benefits. [read post]