Search for: "ESTATE OF ALLEN v ALLEN" Results 61 - 80 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 5:54 am
.), with introductory note by Theodore Kill Menci & Garlsson Real Estate SA and Others v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  The case concerned a claim for damages by the estate of a Susanne HInte after the Sun published revenge porn images of her. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Defendant established its entitlement to dismissal on statute of limitation grounds by submitting evidence that the malpractice occurred in 2008, but plaintiff did not commence this action until March 2016, well beyond the three-year limitation period for legal malpractice (CPLR 214[6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]; Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 93 [1982]). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am by Ben
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
" The Appellate Division held that a default is not willful when it arises from financial disability or from "a sincere, though mistaken, belief that payments were not required, especially when that belief was based upon advice from counsel" (Parnes v Parnes, 41 AD3d 934, 937 [2007]; see Desautels v Desautels, 80 AD3d 926, 930 [2011]; see also Allen v Allen, 83 AD2d 708, 709 [1981]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
" The Appellate Division held that a default is not willful when it arises from financial disability or from "a sincere, though mistaken, belief that payments were not required, especially when that belief was based upon advice from counsel" (Parnes v Parnes, 41 AD3d 934, 937 [2007]; see Desautels v Desautels, 80 AD3d 926, 930 [2011]; see also Allen v Allen, 83 AD2d 708, 709 [1981]). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm
Justice Cullity’s decision in Banton v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Epstein, Esq., a real estate partner at defendant Jaspan Schlesinger, LLP, advised Mr. [read post]