Search for: "EVERS v. ROSE" Results 61 - 80 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am by David Post
Acuff-Rose), “no man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:32 am
Earlier today this Kat posted a guest item by Katfriend Aaron Wood on the ruling of Mrs Justice Rose in Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:24 am by SHG
You might have read about the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:52 am by Ray Dowd
Yellen, 548 F.Supp.2d 88, 96 (S.D.N.Y.2008), but also that her claims of copyright infringement were objectively unreasonable given that (1) defendant Linda Yellen had registered five different versions of the allegedly infringing script with the Writers Guild of America before ever reviewing Bauer's script, see id. at 94; and (2) “A Rose Is a Rose Is a Rose,” Bauer's script about the relationship between Gertrude Stein and Alice B. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
Halliburton, the “fraud on the market” case, while Rose Ehler recaps Monday’s argument in McNeill v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 6:20 am by Neil Wilkof
If there is a place in the world to come for iconic copyright disputes, then surely the 1990’s Israeli case of Kimron v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 In June 2022, the children and their mother, Respondent Spirit Rose Bridger, left Scotland for the United States, and have lived in Oregon ever since. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:24 pm by Bruce Nye
  But it will hardly be his first such appointment ever. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
In 1985, the Supreme Court said, “The fair use doctrine is not a license for corporate theft, empowering a court to ignore a copyright whenever it determines the underlying work contains material of possible public importance. [read post]