Search for: "Edelman v. Edelman" Results 61 - 80 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint contains no nonconclusory allegations suggesting that the purported negligence by defendants was the “but for” cause of the co-op sustaining actual damages (see Drasche v Edelman & Edelman, 201 AD3d 434, 435 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; Silverstein v Pillersdorf, 199 AD3d 539, 540 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Joshua Wright
  By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d at 39 [emphasis omitted]). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
And, with respect to the Airmax case, the defendants failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that there was no attorney-client relationship between them and the plaintiff (see Edelman v Berman, 195 AD3d 995, 997). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:23 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: DANIEL GEORGE SWAN v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case American Needle v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court also properly determined that although the defendant Miller, Rosado & Algios, LLP, established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as asserted by the respondents against it, the respondents raised triable issues of fact in opposition (see Silva v Worby, Groner, Edelman, LLP, 54 AD3d 634; see also Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007; Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913;… [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a recent ruling, Schmidt v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 8:04 pm by Eric Goldman
I don’t love Justice Edelman’s approach that a Facebook accountholder “publishes” any third-party comments that are within the topical scope of the initial post. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 6:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 12-13 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:17 pm
Edelman later admitted that some of its employees had written the blogs. ... [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am by Anna Christensen
United States to include the decision and a recap by Will Edelman, also from Stanford. [read post]