Search for: "Edwards v. Gross" Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the same judge heard an application in the case of Gahir v Bansai. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
First, in Delaware the standard against which directorial decision-making is measured is gross negligence rather than mere negligence. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:34 am by INFORRM
Articles and Discussion Application of the first data protection principle ,  Edward Capewell  Panopticon Blog – 19 Nov 2010, Discusses Ince v Information Commissioner EA/2010/0089 on whether the disclosure of information might breach the first data protection principle. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:16 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Additionally, imposing a tax only on wages means that those who work for a living and receive a traditional wage (typically, the middle class) would pay a higher rate on gross income than those who receive most of their income through dividends and capital gains (like Warren Buffett) or distributions from partnerships and S corporations (think former Senator John Edwards) which, it’s argued, produces an inequitable and unfair result. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 09, 2008 Edwards v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
The Second Circuit recently addressed these issues in Dongguk University v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
”   Massillon Municipal Court Judge Edward Elum apparently didn’t place as much priority on that as I do. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2018, the Court of Appeal (Gross, Macfarlane and Coulson LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of TLT v Home Office. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
We had a case comment on this blog by Edward Craven and a piece by Tim Lowles. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]