Search for: "Effective Change LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2023, 4:20 pm
Changes to the ‘Separation’ Ground Separation was a ground under the old law, but the new law made critical changes. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:36 am
Also, it may be advisable to review the partnership or LLC agreement of an existing partnership or LLC that has a noncompensatory option outstanding in order to determine whether change is necessary or appropriate in light of the regulations. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:15 pm
Since 1990, our focus has been to integrate best-in-class technologies to provide robust, cost-effective Information Technology (IT) solutions for organizations of all sizes and missions of all criticalities. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Copyright © Nipper, LLC 2004-2007. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:15 am
One possible fix is to change the statute to provide that creditors are not restricted to charging orders in smllcs. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
Was it deliberately inserted at the parents’ insistence based on a belief that their children would be unable to achieve consensus to deal with unknown, future events necessitating changes to the operating [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:53 pm
The new statutue, which will be effective March 18, 2013, contains a number of significant changes. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The Revised LLC Act will be effective on March 1, 2014. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The Revised LLC Act will be effective on March 1, 2014. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The Revised LLC Act will be effective on March 1, 2014. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 6:30 am
Author Michael Stack, CEO Amaxx LLC. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:35 am
There is a possibility, however, that the RULLCA will be modified prior to January 1, 2014 and thus the law governing LLCs may still be subject to change and clarification prior to its effective date. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
The petitioner alleged that because the LLC had no written operating agreement as required by LLC Law Section 417(a), the entity did not attain LLC status and therefore had to be treated as a partnership. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:26 am
Edna Sussman, SussmanADR LLC, has published “The Arbitrator Survey: Practices, Preferences and Changes on the Horizon,” The American Review of International Arbitration, 2015/Vol. 26, No. 4. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a notice issued on September 29, 2021, FERC stated that it did not act on PJM Interconnection LLC’s (PJM’s) proposed reforms to the application of the Minimum Offer Price Rule (MOPR) because the Commissioners are divided two against two as to the lawfulness of the change (Notice). [read post]
