Search for: "Ely v. United States Government"
Results 61 - 80
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
For generations, judges, lawyers, and scholars contrasted the United States with the United Kingdom by pointing to the greater role that judges play here in second-guessing legislative judgment. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
It is about the power of the Government to stymy Parliament. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
She then asked if Government could have waited to prorogue Parliament until after the conference recess. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
Professors accept their share of faculty responsibilities for the governance of their institution. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
The ruling said that the United States must use Chinese prices to measure subsidies, even though the U.S. argued that such prices were distorted. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
United States, in 1935. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
Consequently, both citizens and courts should be chary of efforts by government officials to control the very electoral system that is the primary check on their power3. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am
” In addition, Russia has accused the United States of violating the INF. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:56 am
Supreme Court decided Sveen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
The Congress, the President, the state police, and other government officials are the players. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
The first clue that this method of analysis may not benefit state and local governments is the court’s dismissive characterization that the plaintiffs were “[r]elying on Establishment Clause precedents concerning laws and policies applied domestically. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held last week that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information, comes from Albert Gidari at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog and Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
