Search for: "Emery v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
The Washington Post quotes the investigation as stating that “Huawei and ZTE have failed to assuage the committee’s significant security concerns presented by their continued expansion into the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
On 15 November 2023, there was a hearing in the injunction claim in Orb X International Ltd v Emery KB-2023-004114. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Peregrine (McDermott Will & Emery) and Charles W. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
Cir. 1997); AND The individual infringing and non-infringing components must be sold together so that they constitute a functional unit or are parts of a complete machine or single assembly of parts, Paper Converting Machine Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
