Search for: "Eminent Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 4:29 am by Dan Filler
U of T was recently ranked 12th in the world for graduate employability, and U of T’s alumni include distinguished researchers, teachers, decision-makers, prominent politicians, global business leaders, and eminent philanthropists. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:40 am by Elizabeth Kruska
This is not the dam we're talking about.TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm by Brittany Walter and Steven Hollman
Similarly, the federal government could exercise its power of eminent domain in the form of compulsory licensing—granting use of the patented invention without the owner’s consent, and entitling the owner to seek reasonable compensation later. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
In traditional eminent domain questions, the issue of sovereign immunity is irrelevant. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Both the Federal Circuit and the predecessor Court of Claims have deemed reasonable royalty awards to be “the preferred manner” of compensation under section 1498; in Tektronix Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. 19-1035Issue: Whether 11 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Woodcrest Homes Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Mateo (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1180, 1185, 1190, which involved a complaint challenging a housing project that named only the city and fictitious defendants, but included city council minutes that disclosed the developer; the Court of Appeal there affirmed a judgment entered after a demurrer was sustained on statute of limitations grounds for failure to timely name the developer, explaining that “[s]ince appellants were not ignorant of the developer’s true name, they… [read post]