Search for: "England v. Department of Defense"
Results 61 - 80
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Justice Kennedy with opinion in Murr v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am
Supreme Court in 1966 outlaw banning racial intermarriage, in Loving v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
Morgenthau; for four years he served as the deputy or first deputy commissioner in the Department of Investigation in the administration of Mayor John V. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:26 am
The Court held that in cases such as this one, where the child is so young that she cannot possibly decide the issue of residency, see England v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
Japan The Osaka High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by Defense Minister Tomomi Inada in a defamation lawsuit against a magazine. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
At the time of the events giving rise to his prosecution, he was an officer in the New York City Police Department living with his wife, Kathleen Mangan, and their infant daughter in Forest Hills. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
In Atwater v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
That institution had a long history in England, but it can be summarized briefly.[10] Sometime before or shortly after the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, there was an English administrative department called the Chancery. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
The matter was then referred to the Department of Justice for an advisory recommendation, as the regulations of the time prescribed. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
I disagreed with his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
He said he acted in self-defense. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
As noted by Braiden and Brockman, whether or not the Department of Justice officials are partial or impartial in their decisions, it is imperative that justice appears to have been achieved. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm
He argued that it is defensible because the facts are mainly true. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Our condolences to these departed relists. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19] Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:20 am
In a case called Brady v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
