Search for: "English v. Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2018, 7:39 am by Christine Corcos
Kevin Crosby, Newcastle Law School, has published R v Shipley (1784): The Dean of St Asaph's Case in Landmark Cases in Criminal Law (Philip Handler, Henry Mares, and Ian Williams, eds., Hart Publishing, 2017). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
The House of Lords yesterday ruled that Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabian officials were both immune from civil suit, even though the tort alleged was torture: Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  The decision outlines an apparent variation on the Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] EWCA Civ 75) jurisdiction to dismiss a claim for abuse of process. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The fifth defendant relied on Jameel v Dow Jones and Co Inc ([2005] QB 946) for this point, since the same test used there for whether there was a real and substantial tort applied to the attempt to set aside permission for service. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm by Howard Friedman
Prison policy bars inmates who speak English from receiving correspondence written in foreign languages.In Cotton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  And, over at Balkinization, Georgetown Law’s John Mikhail presents the abstract for his SSRN paper, The Definition of "Emolument" in English Language and Legal Dictionaries, 1523-1806, together with some tables and figures summarizing its main findings showing “why the Trump Justice Department’s narrow definition of ‘emolument’ in CREW v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 8:44 am
District Judge John Jones talks about his ruling on intelligent design & judicial independence. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Supreme Court Rules Government Violated Privacy Rights in GPS Tracking Case In a major victory for privacy, this week in U.S. v. [read post]