Search for: "English v. Manchester"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2012, 4:23 am
" I suspect that the Thuuz algorithm worked overtime for a few minutes last week at the conclusion of the Manchester City v Queens Park Rangers English Premier League match. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm
Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) (20 December 2011), in the Technology and Construction court, an applicant successfully invoked her right to privacy under Article 8, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and was granted an interim injunction to prevent transmission, storage and indexing of any part or parts of certain photographic images taken from the phone, and an anonymity order under CPR r.39.2(4), as explained by Rosalind English here. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
The low number of statements in open court in 2011 is another indication of the declining numbers of libel cases before the English courts. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
Tom Gibbons (Manchester) looked at the relationship between reputation and privacy within Article 8 ECHR, and the differences between English law on defamation and on privacy. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:06 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts The English riots Do burglars have human rights? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See Rosalind English’s commentary to this case here. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:51 am
In most respects, the American system of law and the English system of law are similar. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Sequel to Manchester v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45: Article 8 ECHR requires Court to consider proportionality before granting any possession order against a home R v Forsyth and Mabey [2011] UKSC 9. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm
He also held that the missing pane to the double glazed window had made a “small” contribution for about a year.Disrepair damages were assessed “following the approach” in Wallace v Manchester CC [1998] 3 EGLR 38, as follows: £1200 pa for the 3 years of lack of adequate heating due to the boiler. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
In the case of Attorney-General v Greater Manchester Newspapers ([2001] EWHC QB 451) Butler-Sloss P held that it was sufficient if someone was “well aware of the spirit of the order” [19] Although the position is not wholly clear, it appears that this is the same test as is applied in relation to the application of the Spycatcher principle to third parties. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
In the recent case of G.D. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
At the protest in Manchester, Mrs. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The current position in English law may not be so simple. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
Arsenal FC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am
Then Manchester United and Manchester City denied having banned their players from using social media. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
