Search for: "Entertainment by J and J Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Shares in Snap Inc, owner of the social media site SnapChat, plunged on Friday and dragged down other ad-dependent tech firms, after the photo messaging app owner warned of a prolonged hit from Apple Inc’s privacy changes on iOS devices. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Dirk Auer
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> (“CBC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
 Introduction The following Comments are respectfully submitted by the signatory organizations Songwriters Guild of America, Inc. [read post]
In this decision of the Patents Court, Meade J dismissed an infringement claim brought by Promptu against Sky, on grounds that Promptu’s patent lacked inventive step. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Alberta Computers.com Inc v Thibert, 2021 ABCA 213 the Court of Appeal of Alberta dismissed an appeal, inter alia, against a defamation judgment in favour of Mr Thibert and an award of damages of $60,000. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On May 2, 2021, the Norwegian data protection authority, Datatilsynet, notified Disqus Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]