Search for: "Epps v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am by Ilya Somin
United States, which struck down a statute requiring state officials to help enforce a federal gun control law) and it cannot do it circuitously, as with Section 1373. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court on April 23, representing the United States in a criminal sentencing case. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at Jennings v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]