Search for: "Establishment Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board" Results 61 - 80 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, past Chair and current Welfare Benefit Committee Co-Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA) RPTE Section Employee Benefits Group, Vice Chair of the ABA Tort & Insurance Practice Section Employee Benefits Committee, former Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group,  an ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits Council Representative and Board Certified in… [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Josh Blackman
I expect these standards to bleed over to the Establishment Clause context. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Green issued his second supplemental decision Sept. 21, 2001. *** Tower Industries, Inc., d/b/a Allied Mechanical (31-CA-26605, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 117) Ontario, CA May 31, 2007. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer is recognized nationally and internationally for her practical and creative insights and leadership on HIPAA and other health and other employee benefit, human resources, and related insurance, health care, privacy and data security and tax matters and policy. [read post]
The bill would establish the Fast Food Sector Council, responsible for creating a fast food workers bill of rights, which would address issues related to wages, working conditions, etc. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Guerra, 479 U.S. 272, 284 (1987) ("the background of [the statute's] legislative history and historical context").Wisconsin Dept. of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Financial Institution Employees (Seattle-First National Bank), 475 U.S. 192 (1986), cast grave uncertainty on that standard. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While many excellent reasons may exist for a business to offer group health coverage for qualifying employees, all employers regardless of size considering offering group health coverage obtained through the SHOP or other sources should keep in mind that employers that establish and maintain group health coverage, the group health plans they establish and the company or persons with discretionary authority or responsibility for the maintenance, management or administration of these… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees contend that the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v Barber Foods, Inc and, more importantly, with the High Court’s decision in IBP, Inc v Alvarez. [read post]