Search for: "Eugene Cox"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
But the principles underlying the case, relating to whether all those who use mass communications technology should be accorded the same protections as ‘big’ media, nevertheless inspire trenchant views: the cudgels have now been taken up by Eugene Volokh of the Volokh conspiracy blog, who has become involved in Cox’s case on a pro bono basis, and Cox has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:02 pm
Cox. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 10:18 am
See Cox v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 8:31 am
Cox and his team from the law firm of Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher billed for only $ 215,489.75, a more than 50% discount from the full billable amount of $ 468,368.23. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:32 am
We noted this anomaly in Cox Broadcasting [v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
” Bill Rankin of Cox Newspapers (via NewsOK) looks at the effect that the Court’s decision may have on challenges to constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
Fighting words, which are restricted because of a danger that they can provoke criminal retaliation, have also at times been folded within this doctrine: Cox v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 1:54 pm
Some might ask: Why doesn't the federal government go after the picketers under the federal law related to picketing the homes of judges, jurors, witnesses, or court officers (which is likely constitutional given Cox v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm
Cox (9th Cir. 2014) (so holding). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:42 am
Cox, The protections of the First Amendment do not turn on whether the defendant was a trained journalist, formally affiliated with traditional news entities, engaged in conflict-of-interest disclosure, went beyond just assembling others’ writings, or tried to get both sides of a story. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:09 am
” Similarly, in Cox v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:04 pm
Laverne Cox, working the carpet for E! [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Smith’s pick from Louisiana, Dale Cox, is quoted as saying “[i] think we need to kill more people. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
Cox, III, and Senior Judge H.F. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh notes a pending petition on abortion clinic protests and the First Amendment (McCullen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to say that Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, and Lisa Beth Zycherman (all of Davis Wright Tremaine) and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker supporting the petition for certiorari in Dariano v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In April 1966, a black couple named Cox asked for a police escort to go into a white-owned dry cleaner and, a week later, shots were fired into their home. [read post]
