Search for: "Evens v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 61 - 80
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
While the test is fairly strongly entrenched in cases directly challenging matters of economic and social policy, confirmation that it extends to the details of policy implementation will mean claimants continue to face an uphill battle even where the issues are relatively narrow and focused. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[12] Even opponents of the guidance agreed that the SEC has authority to mandate environmental-related disclosures—and that such disclosures have long encompassed climate-related matters. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
This Section gives the workers’ comp insurance carrier a right to a credit, or offset, on other types of benefits, including Social Security Retirement, unemployment compensation, severance and pension benefits. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
He also stressed that even under the current rules, amending or canceling a plan may call into question whether it was entered into in good faith and thus provides a safe harbor. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am
”[5] Parkland, in its response to the notice of application, likewise characterized the concept of irreparable harm in terms of anticompetitive price increases to consumers, although disputed factually that such price increases would likely occur: “the Commissioner has not established that it is highly probable (or even likely) that consumers will pay higher prices during the pendency of his application such that irreparable harm will result absent a hold separate… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[21] Our staff’s investigative work likewise would stand on its own even if we permitted defendant denials. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
The incentives aggravated by this funding plan make it even harder for real concerns about monetary, security, and privacy costs to be taken seriously.[3] The funding proposal we are considering today—the latest effort by the CAT LLC to fund past and future expenses—employs an apparently plausible approach to allocating CAT costs. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:10 pm
May your remaining years be filled with comfort, joy and security. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 11:23 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Moos and Anor) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 957 (Admin) – Read Judgment The High Court has decided that the actions of police in “kettling” climate change protestors during the G20 summit were unlawful. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Dec. 31. 2014), the plaintiffs took issue with documents that had been produced in discovery that contained the plaintiffs' social security numbers, claiming that the mailing of these documents violated a Michigan state law against transmitting full social security numbers through the mail. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
With regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s findings, the use of video surveillance and GPS is generally not permitted for productivity management although it may be permitted if the employer can show a bona fide safety or security reason for the surveillance. [read post]
