Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 61 - 80
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Louisiana.October 31, 2017.Joan Baye, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine Zabetti Crouch, Crouch Law, LLC.Midland Credit Management, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew W. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Louisiana.October 31, 2017.Joan Baye, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine Zabetti Crouch, Crouch Law, LLC.Midland Credit Management, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew W. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:32 am
Note the difference between affirmance rates in ex parte-type proceedings versus the rates in inter partes-type proceedings. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:28 am
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2788857 Goldman, Eric, Ex Parte Seizures and the Defend Trade Secrets Act (November 30, 2015). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is on recess until Feb 17. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
by Dennis Crouch A new Supreme Court justice will likely be in place by the end of April, although the Trump edition is unlikely to substantially shake-up patent law doctrine in the short term. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:01 am
This goes beyond the also-cited old case of Ex parte Adams, 84 Off. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
by Dennis Crouch Substantive Patent Law: Newly filed petition in Merck & Cie v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
by Dennis Crouch Constitutional Challenge to Inter Partes Review: Although the Constitutional issues in Cooper v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
by Dennis Crouch Cooper v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Lee, No. 16-205 (Does the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in a reexamination order limit the scope of the ex parte reexamination) Design Patents: Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm
Lee, No. 16-205 (Does the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in a reexamination order limit the scope of the ex parte reexamination) Design Patents: Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 8:32 am
by Dennis Crouch A new petition by Pactiv (a Reynolds Co.) asks the Supreme Court to consider whether the PTO can expand the scope of an ex parte reexamination beyond the “substantial new question of patentability” identified in the Director’s order granting the reexamination. [read post]
11 May 2016, 12:40 pm
Download it now: DTSA Mark-UP CROUCH We have covered the DTSA legislation and legislative process in several Patently-O Posts, including the following: Crouch, DTSA as a Shoe Horn for Contract and Employment Law Claims Crouch, Implementing and Interpreting the Defend Trade Secrets Act Crouch, Immediate Action for Human Resource Departments on the Defend Trade Secrets Act Crouch, White House on Non-Competes and Trade Secrets Crouch,… [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:00 am
One place to look for evidence of bad faith would be the affidavits submitted by the plaintiff in connection with an application for ex parte seizure. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:58 am
One place to look for evidence of bad faith would be the affidavits submitted by the plaintiff in connection with an application for ex parte seizure. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Ex Parte Wood & Brundage, 22 U.S. 603 (1824) McCormick Harvesting Mach. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
And, the USPTO may have been savvy before Ex Parte Lundgren.Unfortunately, business method patents still appear to be troublesome even after the establishment of a prior user defense for business methods, the Alice case, and the recent America Invents Act broadly applicable prior user defense. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am
By Dennis Crouch Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:42 pm
See Glenn, Ex-Parte Seizure of Intellectual Property Goods, 9 Tex. [read post]
