Search for: "Ex Parte DP"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 5:06 am
LSI Logic is pursuing an infringement suit against Vizio in the Central District of California (see ex parte Request Nos. (4) & (5)). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:01 pm
The DPS also has the power to accredit crime labs in the state. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 2:08 am
Claim 1 as upheld by the OD reads as follows (this claim also being maintained by the patent proprietor as part of the main request during the subsequent appeal proceedings):"1. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am
The application in this appeal case refers to a device using "space energy" for therapeutic purposes and foodstuff preparation. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am
The application in this appeal case refers to a device using "space energy" for therapeutic purposes and foodstuff preparation. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
Si l'accord du titulaire est obtenu pendant la procédure orale, il n'est pas nécessaire d'obtenir une nouvelle fois, "conformément aux dispositions du règlement d'exécution", l'accord du titulaire du brevet, présenté comme absolument obligatoire à l'article 113(2) CBE, alors que cet accord a déjà été donné (voir G 1/88, point 5.2.3).2.4 La question qui se pose… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
The decision has the following abstract (translated from the German):For the question of the insignificance of the difference between the full appeal fee and the appeal fee, see Reasons No. 4.8.On the question of an implicit request for correction of a debit order and the timeliness of the submission of a request for correction, see Reasons 5.7 to 5.14.On the issue of ex officio correction of amounts in debit orders, see Reasons 6.1 and 6.2.For the question of interpretation of a… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
In March 2013, in the case of Ex Parte Junius Sereal (read the opinion here), the CCA wrote in its opinion: The DPS report shows that the lab technician who was solely responsible for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:03 am
In the Salvador case, the DPS officials IMO behaved with great integrity and that wouldn't have been necessary. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:59 am
The 83rd Texas Legislature overall had a good session on criminal-justice issues, said Rick Casey at the SA Express News, and in large part Grits would have to agree. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:05 am
Are these not also part of our history? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
Now, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is dealing with the aftermath of this forensic fiasco, with convictions being overturned because of files showing that Salvador’s forensic crime lab results were part of the prosecution’s case, resulting in a due process violation (see, e.g., Ex Parte Junius Sereal.) [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
Motor vehicle glass pane with- an electrical arrangement (3) with conductor junction areas (2) arranged one beside the other on one surface of the pane and- a connecting element which is connected to the conductor junction areas (2) and which is intended to connect the electrical arrangement (3) to a device on the motor vehicle for processing signals or voltage supply,characterised in thatthe connecting element comprises a plug or clamping connector (10) for a flat cable (30) which cable comprises a… [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am
The (former) President of the EPO has referred a point of law concerning the interpretation of Article 108 EPC to the Enlarged Board of Appeal: Lorsque la formation d'un recours et/ou la taxe de paiement ont lieu après l'expiration du délai de deux mois prévu à l'article 108 CBE, le recours est-il irrecevable ou réputé non formé, et la taxe de recours doit-elle être remboursée ? [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as applicant of the refused application in suit and proprietor of the revoked patent in suit, filed appeals (ex-parte appeal T 2719/19 and inter partes appeal T 1513/17) allocated to the same board of appeal. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
Within the two-month period under Article 108 EPC, the opponent filed notice of appeal and paid the corresponding appeal fee. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
In the present case (T 1517/17, consolidated with T 2719/19), the patent proprietor filed an appeal to the interlocutory decision of the opposition division revoking its patent. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
In the cases referred to in answers 1(a) to (c), reimbursement of the appeal fee is to be ordered ex officio.3. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Did Texas DPS unwittingly conspire in using NSA spy intel for drug cases? [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
