Search for: "Ex Parte N.C." Results 61 - 80 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm by cdw
Ex parte William Michael Mason,  WR-73,408-01, WR-73,408-02 & WR-73,408-03 (Tex. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am by Dennis Crouch
Clarified that § 11.305 (relating to prohibited ex parte communications with, e.g., judges, administrative patent and trademark judges, and "employee[s] or officer[s] of the Office") does not "prevent ex parte communication that is authorized by law, rule or court order, in an ex parte proceeding." [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
This struck me as likely unconstitutional, because of its substantive scope, because it was entered as an ex parte TRO with no opportunity for the defendants to be heard, and because it purports to restrict the free speech rights of third parties who also had no opportunity to be heard. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:32 am by Hannah E. Smith, JD
A custody modification order was entered on August 11, 2020, in response to an ex parte motion filed by Mother. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:50 am by John Rubin
Ramseur, 374 N.C. 658, 677 (2020) (holding that retroactive application of repeal of Racial Justice Act to pending motion for relief violated ex post facto principles). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:18 pm by Robert B. Milligan
It also provides for ex parte orders for preservation of evidence and seizure of any property used, in any manner or part, to commit or facilitate a violation of the statute, using the procedure contained in the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:26 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
(FP has offices in Houston, D.C., and presumably elsewhere - their office phone has a Raleigh, N.C. area code.)There has always been a version of nonprofit reporting. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:35 am by Susan Brenner
Illinois, supra (quoting Ex parte Terry, 128 U.S. 289 (1888) and Cooke v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by David
The defendant got a license from the non-inventor, now-ex, spouse and argued as a result it could not infringe. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Doe's youngest child, J.K., is not part of this proceeding. [read post]