Search for: "Ex Parte Richardson" Results 61 - 80 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2017, 11:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In 2016, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals unanimously ruled in Ex Parte Antonio Sepeda that habeas corpus writs were the "proper remedy" to compel the Texas Board of Pardons and Parole to comply with state statutes. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part (as to Counts III-VI) and DENIED in part (as to Counts I and II).BackgroundJoan Baye had debt. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part (as to Counts III-VI) and DENIED in part (as to Counts I and II).BackgroundJoan Baye had debt. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Plaintiff requests a third of her total legal fees accrued through the date of judgment, but does not suggest how this number relates specifically to the claims against Transworld, who is one of numerous Defendants in this matter and who did not file any of the dispositive motions briefed by the parties and decided by the Court.Although it is the Plaintiff's burden to support her fee request, see Hutchinson ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Wayne Kubsch was convicted of killing his wife, her ex-husband and his stepson for insurance money. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am by Michael Lowe
If this kind of communication happens (called “ex parte communication”) then the result may be a new trial for the defendant if the defense can show the ex parte communication has resulted in prejudice to the defendant. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
It is also among the top priorities for House Speaker Todd Richardson, who said he was personally disappointed when an ethics bills did not pass last session. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Indeed, for the most part the public is unaware the Court of Criminal Appeals even exists, much less do they understand the particulars of what it does. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since violations of the Privacy Rule trigger substantial civil or even criminal penalties under HIPAA, Plans, their fiduciaries, service providers acting as business associates and other members of their workforce need to verify that the disclosure meets all of the requirements to fall within an exception to the Privacy Rule’s prohibition against disclosure before allowing such a disclosure Before Gobeille, many self-insured Plans and their administrators treated the disclosures of… [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:45 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  As part of their efforts to monitor and respond to state law developments, employers and others interested in more information about the Funding Opportunity Announcement can learn more here. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:01 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
FAQ 31 On Coverage of Colonoscopies Pursuant to USPSTF Recommendations Concerning colonoscopies, FAQ 31 states that because the Agencies view preparation for a preventive screening colonoscopy an integral part of the procedure, bowel preparation medications, when medically appropriate and prescribed by a health care provider, are an integral part of the preventive screening colonoscopy that group health plans and health insurers must cover without cost sharing, subject to… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:01 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
FAQ 31 On Coverage of Colonoscopies Pursuant to USPSTF Recommendations Concerning colonoscopies, FAQ 31 states that because the Agencies view preparation for a preventive screening colonoscopy an integral part of the procedure, bowel preparation medications, when medically appropriate and prescribed by a health care provider, are an integral part of the preventive screening colonoscopy that group health plans and health insurers must cover without cost sharing, subject to… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As part of these rules, the “Business Associate” requirements of the Privacy Rule prohibit Covered Entities from disclosing or allowing business associates to use, and business associates from receiving or using protected health information unless the parties first enter into a written business associate agreement that complies with the requirements of the Privacy Rules. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As part of these rules, the “Business Associate” requirements of the Privacy Rule prohibit Covered Entities from disclosing or allowing business associates to use, and business associates from receiving or using protected health information unless the parties first enter into a written business associate agreement that complies with the requirements of the Privacy Rules. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A fee or compensation is paid “in connection with or as a result of” such transaction or service if the fee or compensation would not have been paid but for the transaction or service or if eligibility for or the amount of the fee or compensation is based in whole or in part on the transaction or service. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A fee or compensation is paid “in connection with or as a result of” such transaction or service if the fee or compensation would not have been paid but for the transaction or service or if eligibility for or the amount of the fee or compensation is based in whole or in part on the transaction or service. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
For its part, Tokyo seems similarly circumspect about prospects for a harmonious future. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:01 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As part of ACA’s massive restructuring of the health care payment system enacted by President Obama and the then Democrat-led Congress, most Americans now must pay an “individual shared responsibility payment” unless enrolled in “minimum essential coverage” one of the ACA-approved health coverage options. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Commenting that this preemption reaches to any state law that has an impermissible “connection with” ERISA plans, Justice Kennedy took judicial notice that ERISA seeks to make the benefits promised by an employer more secure by mandating certain uniform reporting and other oversight systems and other standard procedures, Justice Kennedy said ERISA’s extensive reporting, disclosure, and recordkeeping requirements are central to, and an essential part of, this uniform plan… [read post]