Search for: "Ex parte K. C." Results 61 - 80 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a rule, the Boards admit amendments when they are filed in response to objections or evidence that are not part of the impugned decision but have been submitted for the first time in the course of the appeal proceedings. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A transfer can only be acknowledged from the date when adequate evidence to prove the transfer was filed, i.e. ex nunc (cf., among others, T 956/03, T 1137/97, T 1421/05). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
If such a request is considered to be admissible, does the ED have to decide on this request in ex parte proceedings in a binding manner so that the OD is precluded from examining whether the correction decision amounts to an unallowable amendment of the granted patent? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Wells Bennett
AE 052: Government’s Consolidated Notice Regarding Ex Parte, In Camera Filing and Motion for Finding (classified) g. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the change of company to be taken into account ex officio at any time.[2] The appeal cannot be allowed. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:57 am by Jon Hyman
One of the benefits my kids get from going to a K – 12 school is the experience of varsity high-school sports. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:19 am by Joshua Holt
§ 121) Pension benefits A spouse’s pension benefits are often part of a property settlement. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Pylon: Jettisoning the presumption of irreparable harm in injunction relief (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: BPAI’s ex parte decision based upon new factual findings constitutes a new ground of rejection: In re Stepan Co. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
The SEC’s Laconism Yesterday, I commented on the laconism inherent in the SEC’s descriptions of  its ex parte meetings with outsiders during the rulemaking process. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(c) In respect of appeals filed after this date, however, the position has been changed by the amendments to the RPBA which then came into force. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
  Before the time stamp was canceled, however, K. obtained via an ex parte hearing on April 3 an order setting a new trial motion hearing for April 12 with a deadline for the Hospital’s opposition papers of April 10. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
Examination proceedings are ex parte proceedings between the EPO and the applicant/patentee (see A 60(3) and A 94(3)). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:02 am by lopeznoriega
Ley de Exámenes Finales ¡Maestra, Alejandro no se deja copiar! [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
Rule 42(1)(c) EPC also requires a description of “the advantageous effect of the invention with reference to the prior art” in the patent application. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Nicholas Franssen
Kennedy (i.e. the EPPO’s headquarters in Luxembourg) following the ECJ’s judgment in Case C-281/22 G.K. appears to have been celebratory, bordering on self-congratulatory. [read post]