Search for: "Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
The statutes in Delaware, New York, California, and also in Minnesota, provide that the protection of indemnity extends as to persons no longer in the corporate role related to the lawsuit. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:08 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
Warren, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, GeoEye, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:00 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
Warren, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, GeoEye, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
This issue has recently been addressed in the case of Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background Summit Accomodators, Inc. was in the business of facilitating so-called “1031 exchanges. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
An early assessment should be made of the execution risk associated with each bidder in the process and considered in the context of (i) selecting the short-listed potential buyers and (ii) definitive transaction terms and deal protections (i.e. regulatory conditions and reverse break fees). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
  The Director and Cascades Inc. entered into Minutes of Settlement executed on April 14, 2010, whereby the Director agreed, subject to approval by the Tribunal, to remove Cascades Inc. as a person named in the Director’s Order, in exchange for a contractual guarantee by Cascades Inc., to perform the work that Cascades is required to perform under the Director’s Order. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:29 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
  Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Executive Risk Indemnity v, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, we see Justice Jone's decision on this issue: "We are asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they have no… [read post]