Search for: "Express Commercial Capital LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Francis Pileggi
The court also relied on the reasoning of the Prairie Capital case, linked above, which involved similar contract language that included express anti-reliance provisions. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:27 am by Jani Ihalainen
This was important as to the estoppel claim, as there could be no reasonable reliance due to this express wording within the communication. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am by Peter J. Sluka
HRS and the Operating Agreement In 2005, Jean Hieber and Fred Taverna formed Hieber Reade Street LLC (the “Company” or “HRS”). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 12:13 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Such statements may be identified by the use of words such as anticipate, believe, expect, future, may, will, would, should, plan, projected, intend, and similar expressions. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
This article highlights the commercial power of Lucasfilm and Star Wars. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:53 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: “Pretty teenager girl with surprised expression over blackborad with signs” // ShutterStockThe court concludes “the Defendants’ use of the capitalized phrase ‘Meth Lab Cleanup’ in the Metatags on the Website is a use that is confusingly or substantially similar to ‘Meth Lab Cleanup, LLC,’ the mark at issue in the Trademarks–in–Suit. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:34 am by Blum Law Group
Anisky; James Baggs, Sidney Banner of Express Commercial Capital, LLC; and Fotios Geievelis, Jr. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:34 am by Blum Law Group
Anisky; James Baggs, Sidney Banner of Express Commercial Capital, LLC; and Fotios Geievelis, Jr. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Introduction This is the sixth year that we are providing an annual review of key Delaware corporate and commercial decisions. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 4:46 am
., Serial No. 74382759 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal of MOSKOVSKAYA for vodka, on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive].July 12, 2007 - 2 PM: In re Bridger Management LLC, Serial No. 78516349 [Section 2(d) refusal of BRIDGER CAPITAL for hedge fund services, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark BRIDGER COMMERCIAL FUNDING for commercial lending services].July 18, 2007 - 10 AM: Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Court Rules Calculation of Fair Market Value Under LLC Agreement’s Redemption Provision Needn’t Account for Capital Contributions Hampton v Turner, C.A. [read post]