Search for: "FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC."
Results 61 - 80
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Inc., Admin. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:39 pm
On July 21, 2015, Senators Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) proposed legislation (S. 1806) requiring the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to team with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to establish certain consumer data privacy and car computer network security rules to prevent hacking in all motor vehicles manufactured for sale in the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:09 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), on the other hand, contends that it may be deceptive when the advertising content is not readily identifiable to consumers as such, and it has just issued guidance on how advertisers can stay on the right side of the law. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
–Darnaa v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
And the Kentucky district court in Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
The STRONG Patents Act states that the sending of patent notice letters in bad faith is an unfair or deceptive trade practice under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
“Paid Search Ads” and “Recommendation Widget ads” are similarly close to classic commercial speech as they are designed to fit seamlessly into search engine results or webpages and to link directly to a promoted product or brand. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
” According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), over 73 million victims, including children, were falsely told they could revise their profiles by paying $30 to the website. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
According to the EEOC’s lawsuit in EEOC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
Pati–Port, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
However, the two bodies of law are actually complementary, as both are aimed at encouraging innovation, industry and competition. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:01 am
Federal Trade Commission released 2013 Annual Highlights setting out its priorities over the past year, which generally include promoting online privacy and data security, fostering competition in high-tech industries and healthcare and protecting children and other vulnerable consumers from fraud. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
