Search for: "FIFE v. FIFE" Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by SHG
  I am not a big fan of the Herring decision.On the other hand, Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Given the close coordination of the decisionmakers in the RIF, the employee, said the court, was not introducing a new theory of liability but “merely augmenting the evidentiary basis for the very same age discrimination claim he had already sufficiently pled” (Fife v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:19 pm
" Yesterday's FinCri Advisor featured a jeremiad in which some experts warned that the Cuomo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 4 October 2016, there was an application in the case of Bode v Mundell, There was an application in the case of HCN v Chelsea & Westminster NHS Trust on 6 October 2016 As already mentioned, on 7 October 2016, Master McCloud handed down judgment in Malik v Trump [2016] EWHC 2011 (QB). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am by Giles Peaker
Reference was made to MG v Carmarthenshire County Council [2013] UKUT 0363 (AAC) (CH/1940/2012) in which a room used as an office, with a table and chair but no sleeping facilities was found not to be a bedroom. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am by Giles Peaker
Reference was made to MG v Carmarthenshire County Council [2013] UKUT 0363 (AAC) (CH/1940/2012) in which a room used as an office, with a table and chair but no sleeping facilities was found not to be a bedroom. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am by Giles Peaker
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
to those from the British Isles; a land of turbulent history, a land shaped by time, glaciers, the wind…and the rapacious colonial greed of Romans, Vikings, Normans, Victorians… and Chavs [ASBO peasant underclass] … a land now governed by New Labour and an un-elected Prime Minister [a **** from Fife according to leading Scots blawger and Edinburgh advocate, Reactionary Snob] who wishes to curtail our freedom and ensure that everyone in Britain has an equal… [read post]