Search for: "FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF COMMERCE v" Results 61 - 80 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Here, the arbitration award states that the matter in this case involves interstate commerce and is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
§ 1958, which prohibits using interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
In sum, Professor Amar's broad readings of the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, the First Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment all suggest a broad reading of the requirement that the words "Direct Taxes" impose today. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
To be sure, the Second Bank was modeled on the First Bank, and the Congressional Charter of the First Bank did list reasons for granting the charter that can be tied to the powers that Marshall invoked in McCulloch. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
  His treatment of this subject, and of Marshall’s ambivalence toward taking full advantage of the power to pass all necessary and proper laws for carrying into execution the power to regulate interstate commerce, is simply masterful. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6086 Issues: (1) Whether convicted sex offenders are “required to register” under the federal Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act while in custody, regardless of how long they have until release; (2) whether all offenders convicted of a qualifying sex offense prior to SORNA’s enactment are “required to register” under SORNA no later than August 1, 2008; (3) whether a defendant travels in interstate commerce for purposes… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Sixteen years ago, this Court held that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce authorized it "to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Procedural History Two of the conspirators, Timothy Carpenter and Timothy Sanders, were eventually charged with aiding and abetting robbery affecting interstate commerce and the use or carriage of a firearm in violation of the Hobbs Act. [read post]