Search for: "FLOOD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 12:01 pm by Joseph Tomain
  By December 2010, the District of Columbia and five states (Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey and Washington) have enacted legislation to implement the plan. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by David Fine
District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion for preliminary injunction challenging a 70-year old federal ban on campaign contributions from government contractors in Wagner v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
  However, in Garland, Justice Cullity accepts that there is a chance for an appearance of conflict of interest that could arise if such compensation were to be awarded routinely.[30]  However, because the test was set strictly, the judicial discretion to award compensation in a Cy-près in distribution Garland would not open the flood gates of conflict of interest amongst class members. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm by Matthew Scarola
’” But it left undisturbed the Court’s strong suggestion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:22 pm by Cindy Dabney
  McDonald follows pretty closely on the heels of the famous District of Columbia v. [read post]