Search for: "FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC." Results 61 - 80 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 7:00 am by J. Dana Stuster
Southwest Syria is one of the last enclaves of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), but with the civil war in a late stage and the FSA’s one-time patrons have moved on to other priorities. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:04 pm by David B. Kopel
Worse, the biggest of the gun control groups, Handgun Control, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:50 am by David Grant Crooks
The Texas statute was also passed unanimously by both the Texas House and Senate-indeed, seemingly, everyone can agree that the right of private citizens to exercise their First Amendment rights to free speech and free association should not be chilled by meritless lawsuits. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
The coalition’s 25 representatives from all walks of Canada’s cultural community appropriately described the proposal as “a much needed solution to a large and growing problem that threatens the massive employment, economic, and cultural contributions of Canada’s film, television, and music industries. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
@UniforTheUnion joins @FairPlayCanada coalition askin… 2018-01-29 RT @The_CMPA: Piracy hurts Canada’s production sector. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Michael Geist’s blog has a post Canada’s Missing Internet Provision: Why NAFTA Offers the Chance to Establish Long Overdue Online Speech Safeguards In the case of Vanderveen v Waterbridge Media Inc., 2017 CanLII 77435 the claimant recovered damages for invasion of privacy arising out of the use of a footage of her jogging in a commercial video. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am by Barry Sookman
Is Google, the operator of the world’s most popular search engine, a publisher entitled to the constitutional protections accorded to publishers of free speech? [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Free Speech as a Special Right, Philosophy and Public Affairs Volume 45, Issue 2 Spring 2017 Pages 87–117 , Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper 2017-56 (submitted version), Leslie Kendrick, University of Virginia School of Law. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The Media Reform Coalition also released a statement responding to the announcement of the review of the bid. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And it is profoundly damaging to free speech at colleges and universities, on which free speech throughout American society depends. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
(Note that Brad Benbrook, Steve Duvernay, and I were hired by the Firearms Policy Coalition to be the lawyers for the plaintiffs, so I’m reporting on this in my capacity as a lawyer, not as an academic.) [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Thus, to protect the free speech rights of users, service providers often require that procedural and substantive safeguards to free speech be met before removing content. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Furthermore, the Ninth Circuit has repeatedly found irreparable harm to plaintiffs even where a speech restriction left them free to speak in other ways. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
”) Brad Benbrook, Steve Duvernay and I are representing the Firearms Policy Coalition and some other plaintiffs in challenging the law. [read post]
12 May 2016, 1:59 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The Wall Street Journal writes that Crown said that “technology companies face a daunting challenge in stopping terrorists from accessing online platforms, as they need to respect free-speech rights even as they try to eliminate hate messages. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Sarah Feingold, Etsy, Inc.: Free speech—we need the internet as it is, doing pretty well. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Applicable Legal Standards  Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]