Search for: "Facebook, Inc. " Results 61 - 80 of 4,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
By Suzanna Neal and the Center for Art Law Team On January 30th, 2024, the trial of Accent Delight International Ltd. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  A press release accompanying the bill’s introduction stated that Congressman Pallone introduced the bill “to protect consumers from the bombardment of dangerous and unwanted calls and texts that have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Othram Inc. is a lab specializing in genetic genealogy, and it did further lab work on Rose’s remains to develop her profile, the sheriff’s office said. [read post]
” In other words, an “information content provider” like Twitter or Facebook cannot be held civilly liable for what you or your friend post. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:09 am by Stephanie Ellis
Sign up here for our free monthly newsletter, and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Evan Brown
It looked to the recent Supreme Court case of Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:39 am by Mark Ashton
At or about the time a couple separates one of the spouses is working for StartUp Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal, CyWee argued that the procedure violated both LG’s joinder agreement and the statutory limits on time-barred parties raising new issues as set forth in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]