Search for: "Fair v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am by INFORRM
And we said right at the start that in the time we were given there was no way in the world that we could review all the ways in which law enforcement or security forces can invade privacy. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
We have now been provided with a copy of the statement in open court read on 4 November 2016 [pdf] before Dingemans J in the case of Suresh v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Privacy International has noted the interdependence of privacy upon security as part of a post for National Cyber Security Awareness Month and has published a series of posts: a series of podcasts on cyber security, analysis of a report from the High Commissioner for Human Rights into safeguarding privacy in the digital age; and suggested frameworks for regulating cyber-crime and implementing cyber security measures whilst explaining the difference… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The CJEU reference in Case C-362/14, Schrems v Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am by INFORRM
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm by Mike
Astrue is an appeal of the commissioner's denial of benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report has produced a summary of the European Commissioner’s Q&A on the Revised Standard Contractual Clauses. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada (Attorney General) Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
This has remained a basic issue of fairness and economic security for women (predominantly) who work part-time as a way of balancing their job responsibilities with the family care for which women remain primarily responsible. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian and Vanity Fair have analysis whilst Pogowasright also considers the issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am by Stewart Baker
Waiting in the wings for that event is even more antitrust action, possible new online privacy rules and Commissioner Slaughter’s enthusiasm for addressing racial equity quotas under the guise of algorithmic fairness. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:27 pm
She later discovered that this citation, which contained personal identifying information (including her Social Security number), had been published on the Clerk's public website.Lambert sued the Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]