Search for: "Famous Smith v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
See Elrod v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am
State Department. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
On December 28, Chief Judge Rodnay Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted Ericsson an unprecedented--and in my view, outrageously overreaching--temporary restraining order (TRO) against Samsung's pursuit of a Chinese action intended to resolve a global FRAND rate dispute. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:04 pm
Key Issue Addressed: The court, in Zayo Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
” This position finds strong support in one of the Supreme Court’s most famous First Amendment cases, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
”[1] In the depths of the Great Depression, Congress and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (known for a slightly more famous quotation about “fear”) enacted the first federal securities laws. [read post]
