Search for: "Farley v. Doe"
Results 61 - 80
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
Ct.) 367 Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In Matal v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
PTO got it right. https://t.co/4TdCl7b8Ks — Christine Farley (@Prof_Farley) May 9, 2017 Trademark law does not give you ways to “own” clever — or asinine — phrases or slogans. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
In my humble opinion, the Law Professors Amicus Curiae brief filed on November 6, 2016, by Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University Washington College of Law and Professor Rebecca Tushnet of Georgetown University Law Center, make this and other points quite well. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
(2) Each examiner has limited time and resources; a lot depends on what the applicant does. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
” Farley v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:30 am
Thurmond v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
Gulp v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
In Farley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
The lawyer’s question: what does that tell us? [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Note that Byron does win here; it’s a story about the failure of law to suppress speech. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
That’s what Golan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Renna v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
